Search for: "MMIA"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2009, 12:17 pm
After numerous presentations at the roundtable calling for expanded fair dealing (from education, researchers, and artists), the MMIA argued: We find ourselves in the Manitoba music industry more aligned with some of the creators coalitions and independent music groups and less aligned with CRIA and the RIAA. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 2:15 am
In Lyons v MMIA (730 N.Y.S.2d 345), the structured settlement broker for former medical malpractice insurer MMIA was complicit in the manipulation of the discount rate the discount rate to pump up the present value of the case. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 6:40 am
MMIA was aware that the alleged misrepresentation was going to be used for a particular purpose, the plaintiffs were a known party who allegedly relied on the alleged misrepresentation in furtherance of that purpose, and there was conduct by MMIA linking it to the plaintiffs and evincing its understanding of such reliance" While I agree that it is a good idea for a plaintiff attorney to seek independent advice from their own qualified settlement consultants (indeed the… [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 9:02 am
Indeed MMIA, through its claims examiner, Joseph T. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 1:56 pm
Download MacomberTravelersII040406[1] Meligan's "analysis" of Lyons v MMIA is a bit simplistic, just like his affiliate Bill Tilley's chestnut from September 2009 (see below) Download LyonsvMMIA286AD2d711Bill Tilley Dishes Out "Old Rag" on Settlement Planning BlogThe settlement profession has evolved over the years. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 11:45 am
Download 15912607080 Comments Unlike the facts and circumstances involved with a 2001 decision Lyons v MMIA 730 N.Y.S. 2d 345, privity did not come into play. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 10:16 am
The Grillo cases against the attorneys and the guardian ad litem centered upon not doing a structured settlement and not preserving the public benefits that the plaintiff was entitled to.The matter of Lyons v MMIA 730 N.Y.S. 2d 345 centered on the issue of privity and New York's Appelate Division for the second department overturned a lower court ruling that said defendants do not owe a duty of privity to the plaintiffs In a matter that involved numerical manipulations of present… [read post]
